All People Are Born Entrepreneurs, Then Society Takes This Away

The Disciplined Entrepreneurship Toolbox

Stay ahead by using the 24 steps together with your team, mentors, and investors.

Start free trial
Sign up for our newsletter

Share this with your network

Articles / Blog / FeaturedPublished on April 24, 2022. No comments.

Bill Aulet

Interview originally published in Ta Nea (Greek newspaper) on March 29, 2022

Q. In Europe universities and entrepreneurship have a “complicated, love/hate relationship”. What is the way to “make it work”?

A. First of all, Europe does not have a monopoly on this complicated relationship. It exists around the world. Entrepreneurship has not been taken seriously as a field of research and as such the body of knowledge is insufficient for the demand now put on the universities for teaching it. One of the key factors is that research likes clean data sets and it is very hard to get such data sets for new entrepreneurial ventures. Just ask any entrepreneur.

Secondly, the study of business commenced about 150 years ago with the industrial revolution. It focused on how we manage and produce predictable, optimized, and de-risked results. This is the essence of management with things like planning, budgeting, human resource management, financial leverage, supply chain optimization, six sigma quality assurance, and the like. What is common in these things is the assumption of an existing organization. Entrepreneurship is about creation not optimization and derisking. The game is changing.

Academic institutions with tenure, i.e. job for life, or tenure-like arrangements for faculty are, as a result, systems with a lot of inertia. That inertia makes them slow to change and that is what you see right now with the need for the change described above.

Q. A 2015 report about the Entrepreneurial Impact of MIT said that the Alumni-founded companies had created 4.6 million jobs, generating nearly $2 trillion in annual revenues. That would make them the 9th largest economy in the world. What makes MIT-trained entrepreneurs so successful?

A. It is right there in MIT’s motto, “mens et manus,” which translates to “mind and hands.” While others pursue knowledge for knowledge’s sake, a legacy of universities being set up to train clergy and philosophers, MIT’s mission is much different. It is to create a body of knowledge that can be applied to the world’s greatest challenges. As such, this has created a culture of problem-solving. Knowledge by itself is insufficient. It must be applied.

So it starts with the motto and mission and then it builds from there. This has created some initial successes which then creates a virtuous positive reinforcing feedback loop that others see as possible and attempt to do the same. With more success, more people with entrepreneurial tendencies tend to apply and choose to come to MIT which further enhances the entrepreneurial results and so forth. But if you had to point to one thing, it all starts with the DNA from the birth of the institution codified in the motto and mission.

That being said, we have gotten great support to develop a rigorous and relevant innovation-driven entrepreneurship curriculum and associated co-curricular and extra-curricular set of programs to amplify this tendency. MIT has recruited and supports a world-leading set of faculty at the MIT Sloan School of Management who do research on innovation and entrepreneurship. These academic faculty work to make sure we have an evidence-based approach to teaching this important subject. We complement this with highly skilled practicing entrepreneurs to work in tandem with the academic to produce that rigor and relevance we believe is critical to a successful entrepreneurship education program.

Q. Is it that the MIT students and alumni are very entrepreneurial, or do they take cues from their professors? 

A. Much less than one would think from the outside. Yes, there are iconic professors like Bob Langer, Dmitri Bertsimas, and Greg Stephanopoulos to name a few who have started multiple companies, but there are also many others who have started none. Professors starting companies is certainly accepted (up to 20% of any professor’s time can be spent on outside activities which may or may not be related to starting a company) but it is not universal. I would argue that MIT has been and will always be a “bottoms up-driven” university rather than a “top-down-driven” organization. That means that the leadership of MIT does not dictate or carefully set directions but rather depends on the drive and creativity coming from the students and faculty. In this case, the students drive entrepreneurship at MIT more than the faculty.

Q. What is needed to help the alumni of Greek universities follow the same steps?

A. I think, first of all, Greek universities need to be supported in increasing their entrepreneurship offerings. The demand for this far exceeds the current capacity. The role of the universities is not to create companies but rather to focus on creating entrepreneurs. There need to be more entrepreneurs and they need to be of a higher quality, what we call innovation-driven entrepreneurs. I would encourage all universities to get, read and take to heart a new book called “From the Basement to the Dome: How MIT’s Unique Culture Created a Thriving Entrepreneurial Community” by Jean-Jacques Degroof. It explains the lessons learned on how to do this but of course, it will need to be adopted to the specific content of each Greek university but it gives a detailed road map as a place to start.

Q. How vital is technology transfer for society?

A. A vibrant technology transfer is a vital part of any university that wants to have an impact. It is the structure and vehicle to move research from the lab to the marketplace. It is important but not the only vehicle. In fact, it is less important than most people imagine. For example, each year at MIT, we have approximately 20-30 companies that are started directly through licenses from the MIT Technology Transfer office. These are very important companies and the office provides a clear path for professors to move their breakthrough ideas to the market for impact. However, each year, MIT and MIT alumni start approximately 1,000 new companies. You can see that the vast majority (97% or more) are not started through the licensing office. This is in no way a bad reflection on the technology transfer but rather indicates if we train students to understand technology, give them a problem-solving mentality and effectively educate them on the entrepreneurial process while instilling them with the proper mindset and way of operating (with a community), the results are less technology-specific than one would imaging.

Q. Is there a formula for a successful entrepreneur? Can you teach someone to be a successful entrepreneur? 

A. Interestingly, I would reframe this question. All people are born entrepreneurs and it is then society that slowly dilutes this and even threatens to take it away. From the beginning of time, people survived by making things, trading things, or providing services to people in order to survive.

So an entrepreneurship educator’s job is to bring this back out and then sharpen those skills. There is a lot of empirical evidence that shows entrepreneurship can be learned. The more a person tries entrepreneurship, the more likely they are to be successful.  When entrepreneurship is effectively taught, the results are even more compelling. In our full program, ending with the delta v fully immersive educational accelerator, the success rate of our students who start from scratch at the beginning of the process (as measured by whether they are in business five years later) is well over 70%. We also have other data that shows very compellingly that entrepreneurship can be taught.

While there is no algorithmic formula to guarantee the creation of a successful entrepreneur and there never will be since success is the achievement of something that is novel and never seen before, there are first principles that dramatically improve the odds of success. Those first principles create the characteristics that we refer to as the 4H’s.

It all starts with the heart and creating the mindset or spirit of being an entrepreneur. This is the joy and drive of being different to make the world a better place. Entrepreneurs not only have the drive to improve over the current status quo, they delight in doing this. Secondly, the successful entrepreneur must understand the first principles of the skills required to achieve their goals. This is the second H, the head. This is the tested body of knowledge that we know improved the odds of success when embarking on an entrepreneurial initiative. This is not from a single source but it is from multiple sources. My just-released book in Greece “Disciplined Entrepreneurship” (check the title here as I believe it has been translated to something more like “Principled Entrepreneurship”) is an excellent example of the first principles. Knowledge alone is not sufficient however to be a successful entrepreneur, it must be conveyed into real-world capabilities. This is the third H, the hand. Since entrepreneurship is a craft, not a science or art, it should be taught in an apprenticeship model. To create entrepreneurs, we must offer co-curricular and extra-curricular programs to supplement the theory we teach in the classroom. Lastly, successful entrepreneurs need to learn how to effectively, efficiently, and quickly access resources beyond their control. This is where the last H comes in, home. For entrepreneurs to increase their odds of success, they need to have a community-based way of operating that is different from the command, control, and conquer approach that is traditionally taught in schools of management.

These are the pillars of our educational program to create high-quality entrepreneurs and it is working as we noted above.

Q. What is the value of organizations like MITEF Greece in cross-pollinating the local communities with the entrepreneurial DNA of the MIT alumni?

A. MIT Enterprise Forum of Greece and similar high-quality organizations play a vital role in creating entrepreneurs and ultimately the companies they create that change the region and world. As noted, entrepreneurship is a craft, and learning it can’t not be done just in a classroom. MIT EF Greece provides the structure and mentors for an apprenticeship model. They also provide invaluable contacts to help the entrepreneurs jump-start their community. In addition, each entrepreneurial journey is unique and the MIT EF Greece can provide the context to apply the first principles. Lastly, the emotional support for something as challenging as entrepreneurship, it is important to have the emotional support of a community like MIT EF Greece to sustain the journey and for the entrepreneur to maintain their mental health. In sum, for these reasons and more, organizations like this are invaluable.

Q. Is innovation-driven entrepreneurship important only for startups? How can large corporations benefit from cultivating the entrepreneurial spirit of their employees?

A. Absolutely not. The Entrepreneurial mindset, skillset, and way of operating should not be confined to startups. Large organizations need entrepreneurs more than ever. Corporations, government, academic institutions, non-profits, and more, need to continue to innovate or they will die out or at a minimum perform suboptimally. As a society, if we are to solve the intractable problems we have in areas like climate change, health care, education, financial inclusion, and much more, we need entrepreneurs everywhere. Startups will only get us the low-hanging fruit. To get the bigger fruit higher up on the trees for areas as I have described above, we will need entrepreneurs in platforms with bigger assets and that means entrepreneurs in large organizations.

Q. What is your advice to Greek universities? Should they be managed by academics or professionals (from the market) in order to succeed in the very competitive global environment?

A. The universities need to be managed by both. As my colleague at MIT, Dean Nelson Repenning, says “My classroom works best when we privilege neither theory nor practice, but instead make sure both are front and center, highlighting where they align and debating the relative merits when they don’t.” It is similar to running a university. We need both academics and practitioners working in harmony to solve the challenge of creating and teaching this new important craft of innovation-driven entrepreneurship.

More specifically, my advice would be to read Dr. Degroof’s book and take it to heart.

Lastly, I would encourage a nationwide effort to make entrepreneurship education something that goes beyond the traditional barriers of a universities’ walls. They should partner with the government and organizations like MIT EF Greece to create an annual Grand Entrepreneurship Prize with extensive programming to support it. The programming that is now possible through online classes presents exciting opportunities to make their content, which has been historically only available to a select few, more broadly available to everyone in Greece. MIT EF Greece could help with the outside the university programming, in collaboration. The government could play a powerful role in marketing, financial support, and brokering across different stakeholder groups. I encourage the universities, and others, to think more ambitiously. If we are to survive and thrive, and I would argue if democracy is to survive and thrive, we need to create not thousands more entrepreneurs but millions. Then we will give all Greeks the opportunity for hope and pride in their lives and true incentives for rigor. It is not only possible but Greece would be the ideal place to implement such a plan.

Q. How much did the pandemic affect universities? Do you see in your students a difference in their behavior or their performance?

A. The pandemic just accelerated the need for entrepreneurship education and reinforced the notion that is relevant beyond just startups. The disruption to our lives and the creative thinking required to survive, solve and come out stronger on the other side, clearly illustrated the value of having people with an entrepreneurial mindset, skill-set, and way of operation. We will never go back to our old ways. Looking at the long arc of history, we know that the rate of change will continue to accelerate. In such a world, entrepreneurs are needed more than ever – throughout all of society. That became crystal clear more than it ever had before. We cannot go back to the old ways. Students feel this and want entrepreneurship more than ever. Faculty and administrators know it. We welcome the challenge but it will not be easy. We need to work more collaboratively than we ever have before and embrace the uncertainty. In other words, act like entrepreneurs ourselves.

The author

Bill Aulet

A longtime successful entrepreneur, Bill is the Managing Director of the Martin Trust Center for MIT Entrepreneurship and Professor of the Practice at the MIT Sloan School of Management. He is changing the way entrepreneurship is understood, taught, and practiced around the world.

More about Bill

Latest tweets

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.
Follow @BillAulet
The books

This methodology with 24 steps and 15 tactics was created at MIT to help you translate your technology or idea into innovative new products. The books were designed for first-time and repeat entrepreneurs so that they can build great ventures.

Pre-order the books

Entrepreneurship in Dubai After COVID: Accelerating, Confident and Poised to Take an Increasing Role

The Disciplined Entrepreneurship Toolbox

Stay ahead by using the 24 steps together with your team, mentors, and investors.

Start free trial
Sign up for our newsletter

Share this with your network

Articles / BlogPublished on April 10, 2022. No comments.

Bill Aulet

On March 10th, I returned to the Gulf Region for the first time in four years at the invitation of the UAE Entrepreneurs Organization (EO). I was not sure what to expect after such an extended time period and so many dramatic changes in the world. After a three-day workshop with an extremely active group of entrepreneurs, I leave very encouraged.

My high-level observations are as follows:

  1. The gap is closing between the Gulf Region and the rest of the world with regard to innovation-driven entrepreneurship. Coming from a history of trading, the region was always right with SME (Small Medium Enterprise) entrepreneurship but the highly scalable variety created by innovative products was a rare beast. That has definitely changed very rapidly.
  2. This progress has been caused by increasing connections to the rest of the world and the development of an increasingly vibrant community. Entrepreneurship is not a solo sport and thrives in clusters. It is not just a support structure but it is also an accelerator from the additional ambition that it creates and the lateral learning that takes place between entrepreneurs. EO UAE has done a fabulous job of catalyzing this and developing programs that are unambiguously focused on and in the best interests of the entrepreneur.
  3. COVID has been another unexpected accelerant. When the proverbial chessboard gets knocked over as COVID did, it is an advantage for new agile, and innovative companies. Speed is the friend of the entrepreneur and speed and creativity were essential to survive and thrive in the pandemic, and Gulf entrepreneurs seized the opportunity.
  4. Confidence is at an all-time high. Seeing the successes of Careem, Souk, and others from the region, has given not just provided a blueprint for successful innovation-driven entrepreneurship, it is made the entrepreneurial mindset to be something to be proud of. Now the prestige jobs are not just working for a big company or the government, but these entrepreneurs are the new rock stars of the region similar to how they are viewed in the US.
  5. Being in person again reminded us of how important personal interactions are to entrepreneurship. COVID brought opportunities for entrepreneurs but there was also a cost. So much of entrepreneurship is about sensemaking and integrating many different intentional and unintentional ambiguous signals so we can see gaps in the marketplace and move forward. Entrepreneurship is a team sport where you are building your team and working with others in the community to quickly garner resources beyond your control. In a Zoom world, this was possible in an intentional way but when in an environment like the three-day workshop, it reminds you of how valuable the unintentional serendipitous collisions are for entrepreneurship.

For me, it was nice to be back in the region and also leading an in-person workshop for the first time in years. The energy was palpable. The community was vibrant. The skill level and accomplishment are higher than ever. The mindset was confident. All of this bodes well for innovation-driven entrepreneurship in the region. A region that very much needs this to create new jobs for the wave of young people hitting the marketplace. The supply of the new young people entering the marketplace cannot be fully employed by the government or large company jobs. As the data shows for the US, the lion’s share of the new job is being created by innovation-driven entrepreneurs and hence their critical role in our future.

The author

Bill Aulet

A longtime successful entrepreneur, Bill is the Managing Director of the Martin Trust Center for MIT Entrepreneurship and Professor of the Practice at the MIT Sloan School of Management. He is changing the way entrepreneurship is understood, taught, and practiced around the world.

More about Bill

Latest tweets

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.
Follow @BillAulet
The books

This methodology with 24 steps and 15 tactics was created at MIT to help you translate your technology or idea into innovative new products. The books were designed for first-time and repeat entrepreneurs so that they can build great ventures.

Pre-order the books

Chapter 2: The Basics of Finance

The Disciplined Entrepreneurship Toolbox

Stay ahead by using the 24 steps together with your team, mentors, and investors.

Start free trial
Sign up for our newsletter

Share this with your network

Articles / Blog / FeaturedPublished on January 30, 2022. 14 comments.

Bill Aulet

In this chapter, we will teach you the basics of finance without all the details. Think of this as Financial Literacy which is not going to earn you a degree in finance but it will give you the fundamentals so you know how to run and keep track of your business. We will dive into these high-level concepts as we move forward, especially in the modeling phase which will come next but for now, let’s just level set on the most foundational concepts and then build up from there. We will focus on operational concepts as opposed to accounting concepts for now.

From an operational standpoint, the most simple level for finance is cash in, cash out, and net cash flow.

The simple link between these is

cash in – cash out = net cash flow

Notice I am not yet using terms like profit, sales, expenses because these all have very specific accounting meanings and we will get to them but for now, as we said in chapter 1, cash is oxygen and if don’t have cash, we die. As an entrepreneur, you always need to understand the cash first. Cash is the ultimate measurement you must be concerned with. We will talk about many specific financial statements for a business in this chapter (the three most popular are income statement, balance sheet, statement of cash flows) but I always say the most important statement for an entrepreneur is the bank statement. This is because; while incomplete for sure, it is very real and tells you how much cash you have in the bank. That is a good starting point. As you will see, each financial view of your business has strengths and weaknesses. The bank statement is very easy to understand and it is very real which is it strength. Its weaknesses are that it is just one point in time and even then it does not give you insights into obligations and assets that you have at that point in time. It does not tell you the rate at which you are gaining or losing money either because it is just one point. The trend, or rate, at which you are gaining or losing cash is captured most simply in the statement above when we add the implied assumption that it is for a period of time (often a year but it could be a month or a quarter or whatever is chosen):

cash in – cash out = net cash flow for a period of time

You now might say that this would represent profit, but that is not correct. You might say it represents your company’s cash burn rate which would be closer to the truth but still not correct. Cash burn rate would be the rate that your business would expect to be running at without an extraordinary transactions related to cash.

As we have defined cash in so far, it is all cash that comes into the company – which could be from normal operations and continual sources of money. What would not be normal would be a onetime transaction where you received money. This cash that resulting from fundraising, a sale of an asset of the company, money received in a legal settlement or any other unlikely to recur event. Likewise, the same is true for cash out where onetime transactions might be things buying a significant asset like a computer, a legal settle you had to pay out, non-recurring marketing campaign, a signing bonus that you don’t think you will have to pay in the future to hire people, severance package and the like.  If you can take all of those onetime transactions out, you will get to what is often referred to as operational net cash flow or cash burn rate which is something very important to know. Let me explain more.

Cash burn rate is a rate of change so it is important to define the period of time, as it is for any rate. So if we can estimate that our cash burn rate per month is $50K (i.e., $50K/month) and I know I have $500K of cash in bank (unencumbered of net liabilities), then I can estimate I have enough cash to last me approximately 10 months. That is very important information to know – and you should know it for sure.

But again, this number has it strengths and weaknesses. The reality is that while it is technically true, when you have employees and other obligations, and you start to run down to less than 3 months (for a general rule) of cash left relative to burn rate, you are flying awfully close to the sun and strange things start to happen. Strange things like employees freaking out and the good ones leaving. However, at the beginning it is very common to fly very close to the sun and everyone just doesn’t get paid but as you get bigger, it is not as well accepted.

That is the simplest explanation of new venture finances but now let’s dive a little deeper on all of these.

Cash In

Cash in is made up of two major components – one-time transactions and recurring. Let’s take a look at each of these and define them for you.

One-time transactions

  • Net proceeds from a fundraising effort: If you raise money in a period from selling stock in the company (called “equity”) or even if you get money from taking out a loan, that is cash into the company but it is not from operations and it is not something that should be expected for the next time period.
  • Sale of an asset: Similarly, you might sell off an asset that either you don’t need or because you have a keen need for cash. That could even be something like computers that you then leaseback. For whatever reason, this inflow of cash likewise cannot be expected to happen in the next time period so it should be called out as one time.
  • Legal settlements: You might get paid for a legal settlement that someone wanted to settle with you to avoid further litigation or gain access to your Intellectual Property. Again, this is a one-time payment and should be called out as such.
  • One-time payments not expected to recur: There could be others ones that we have not listed above but at this point, you should recognized the nature; they are one time and cannot be expected to happen on a predictable basis.

Recurring

  • Sales to Customers (OTC or Subscription or Licensing/Royalty): What is something that you can expect and forecast, is revenue from customers who buy your product. The best type of revenue (which is the same as “sales”) is subscription revenue because it is highly predictable and, hopefully, contractually obligated. Purchase of products that is a one-time upfront charge are also predictable because we can forecast sale unit and price volumes for a time period. While something that we can forecast with confidence, they are less assured than subscription revenue. Licensing/Royalty revenue is like subscription revenue for the most part but it is a mix that depends on how much our partner sells. This (Sales to Customers) is for the most part, the more interesting cash in to a business. It is the starting point for determining the all important “cash flow from operations” calculation.

Cash Out

This section is very similar in structure to cash in so let’s look at the underlying components of the two big components.

One time transactions

  • Buying capital assets: A big use of cash for many businesses, especially those with a hardware component in their product, is the acquisition of big equipment/computers. Even software and data businesses need strong computer platforms to make the businesses run. Many companies, to preserve their cash, will lease this equipment which can make sense. However, if you have access to cash, it is easy to do the calculations and see that you can save a lot of money in the long term if you buy rather than lease. The leasing companies are making money in financing, which may be a premium you are willing to pay because it is the cheapest way to getting capital. It is damn hard, expensive and time consuming to get capital when you are a startup so leasing may be a good option to offset this use of cash but you are going to pay for it. No free or even cheap money anywhere.
    Note: When you buy a “capital” asset, it means it is big enough to “depreciate”.  Depreciation means that because you are going to use that asset (e.g., a computer, a manufacturing machine, etc.) over many years, you can spread the expense over the number of years it has a useful life. That useful life is not something you determine but it is predetermined by accounting standards. It is usually 3 or 5 years. The “expense” however is a non-cash measurement that accounting uses to show the estimated profitability of your organization in a certain time period (e.g., a year, a quarter, etc.).  This makes sense so people can understand pro-rated profitability of your business but it does not explain the cash flow situation – and as any entrepreneur know, CASH IS KING! The same thing can be done for software development or other investments that are expected to pay off over many years and for them, the term “amortization” rather than depreciation is used. This is one of the biggest differences between a “Profit and Loss Statement” and the operating cash flow view that an entrepreneur has to be hyperfocused on.
  • Finder’s Fee/Signing bonus (not expected to repeat): The rest of this list is simply one time fees that can change significantly or disappear from one time period to the next. One common example is that you have to pay a one time finder’s fee to get a key position filled and/or a one time signing bonus. You do not expect this to be a recurring use of cash.
  • Legal settlements: More often with legal settlements in my experience, they are “cash out” rather than “cash in” where you pay a settlement fee to make a situation go away so you can focus on your business. This might be the purchase of a trademark or some other Intellectual Property.
  • Severance: This is really just a legal settlement and the reverse of the signing bonus, but it requires a one time cash payment.
  • One time programs/initiatives not to be repeated:  By now you should see the pattern and this could be a big campaign, tradeshow launch or something that you are confident will not be recurring.  Becareful that before you put things into this category, they are not things that actually will recur each year – like a yearly marketing campaign or tradeshow.  Website rebuilds are another tricky example. It is likely that you will need to make continual investments in websites and digital marketing campaigns so don’t put them in this bucket too easily.

Recurring

These are the items that require a lot of attention and are difficult but very important to get a good estimate on. Even more important, is to develop a model that makes clear what is driving the cashing going out of the business (“expenses” is an approximation here but not exactly the same); what are the key items and assumptions?

  • Cost of Goods Sold (BOM plus direct labor): This is actually pretty straight forward. It is all of the items listed on the BOM (Bill of Material) which can be priced out easily by calling a few vendors. The BOM is a list of all the items required to produce your product. Sometimes people interpret “items” as being parts and do not include the incremental or “direct” labor required to build one more of the product. The direct labor costs should be estimated and absolutely be included too. Your Cost of Goods Sold (often shorten to “COGS”) will likely go down as volume goes up so when you give a COGS estimate, you should tie it back to a volume estimate. In the reporting of past finances, the COGS is known and determined so no estimate is needed. Obviously COGS is affected by the pricing of the components and the companies ability to negotiate good deals for itself with vendors.
    Note: “Gross margin” is a term that is often used. This is the amount of money the company makes from the sale of its products before non-product (i.e., Marketing and Sales, Research and Development, General and Administration) expenses are taken out.  So if a company sells 100 products at $1,000 each netted to the company (a total revenue of $100,000) and the COGS for each product is $333 (total COGS of $33,300), then the Gross Margin is $66,700 for that period of time. The Gross Margin Percentage is 66.7%. You can think of this as the Product Profit Margin.
  • Marketing and Sales (M&S): This is all the cash required to create the demand (i.e., marketing) and then fulfill the demand by getting customer to buy the product (i.e., sales).  All the many elements of this, marketing people, campaigns, consultants, systems, collateral, etc, will be spelling out in the model later and similarly for the sales function.
  • Research and Development (R&D): This is all the expenses associated with the development, acquisition and refinement of the “technologies” (used in the broadest definition possible) needed and possibly needed for our product and its evolution. That is the research component. The development component is all the expenses to develop the product that marketing and sales will sell. Again, all the various components of this like people, computers, systems, training, research materials, etc. will all be detailed in the model later.
  • General and Administration (G&A): These are all the expenses needed to run the business that are not in the M&S or R&D buckets to make a viable business. This includes legal, financial, rent, utilities, insurance, payroll, office equipment and supplies, board of directors, top leadership, etc.
    Note: In each of these salaries, you should consider how much of your expense is related to salary and benefits for employees, which does not mean consultants. The employee salary line is so important to know because it is not an expense that you can cut back in quickly or easily, despite what you might think. Hiring should be a significant vetting process as you will be taking on a commitment to someone. Don’t do it too quickly or take it lightly. Getting rid of employees is a time consuming and costly process that has significant ripple effects if not done properly. This is not always understood by first time entrepreneurs (including myself at the time) and it is why I call this out. Just ask any experienced entrepreneur.

Assets That Cause Your Bank Statement to Be Understated

The cash in and cash out over a period of time, gives us a very important sense of the needs of the business, we also need to know our position at any time. The bank statement gives us a picture of the finances at a specific time whereas the cash flow over a period of time gives us a video picture of how this are trending. The technical words from systems analysis is that a bank statement is a stock (analogy, the level in the bathtub at any time) and the cash flows give us the flow (or the rate at which water is going out the drain combined with the rate water is coming in via the faucet).

That being said, just looking at the bank statement can give you an imperfect impression of your financial snapshot position at the time it is issued.

There are other things that you should also consider.

The biggest asset by far that valuable to you is money you are owed. This is call “Accounts Receivables” or “Accounts Receivables Outstanding” and it represents the amount of money you are owed at that time. Often another measurement is the “averaged days sales outstanding” of your receivables, which indicates how long these receivables have been due to you. A good company collects their receivables promptly but the terms you may offer your customer could be 30 days upon receipt of the invoice. That gives the customer a grace period of 30 days to pay which a smart customer will take. You will pay a price by not having this cash immediately and that is call “float,” the amount of time the customer has money due to you.

It is certainly in your benefit to collect the money as soon as possible because you have already paid your suppliers most likely and you are having to subsidize this float, likely with money that is very difficult, costly and time consuming to get.

Still, understand Accounts Receivables is an asset that is not included in your bank statement and it means your bank statement cash position is understated by that amount or some percentage of it that you are very confident you will be able to collect.

Liabilities That Cause Your Bank Statement to Be Overstated

Like with Accounts Receivable that cause your bank statement to understate your current cash position, there are liability that mean your bank statement cash position is overstated.

The first and probably biggest of these is the money you owe to others including suppliers  and employees in salary which is called “Accounts Payables” or “Accounts Payables Outstanding” at the time. This is a liability that you will have to pay off. Likewise to Accounts Receivables but now you are on the others side, if you pay these later, that give you the cash longer and you get the float.

Another liability that you should be aware of an track is customer that might default and never pay, which would result in bad debt. These means that your Accounts Receivables should be cleaned up to not include customer that will never pay you.

The amount of time you pay your vendors and the amount of time your receive cash from your customer is usually material so you have needs to float this cash for a period of time. For instance, you may have to pay your vendors within 15 days for the parts to build your product. You may well have to buy the parts on average 90 days before they are finally assembled and set out to a paying customer.  That means you will have to pay for the materials in a product, on average 75 days before it ships to a paying customer. That customer then has 30 days to pay for the product.  Assuming they pay right on time at 30 days, that is 105 days between when you had to carry the expenses of the COGS to when you actually got paid. That time requires cash to hold you over. That cash requirement is called “working capital”.  It might not seem like a lot but any cash is important for a new venture. It also turns out to be a requirement for a lot of cash when you volumes go up as your business scales. The irony being, the more you succeed, the more you need cash. A nice problem to have but a problem nonetheless.

Accounting

The above explains the fundamentals of a business that you really need to know to operate it. There are others however who will want to understand the financial strength or weakness of your business (e.g., banks, investors, partners, acquirers) and they would like standard formats with agreed upon standards that can be certified by people they trust.

These standards are define by a field called accounting. They provide a rigorous standardize outline of a business’s financial health. They are financial dashboard for your new venture. They specifically indicate where your money is going, where it’s coming from, and how much you’ve got to work with. It gives you all the information to operate your business in a comprehensive manner but it just is more difficult to get than the manner in which was explained earlier in this chapter. It is, however, the standardize way to do it and it is what people expect to see from your top financial officer.

The three common statements are the Income Statement (also called the Profit and Loss Statement), the Balance Sheet and that Statement of Cash Flows. Let’s have a quick, high level look at what each is.

Income Statement

This statement show you how “profitable” was over a specified time, such as a month, quarter, or year. It gives you an indication of what the cash might be but it is different first of all because of non-cash expenses. When a big asset or expense is made the can be depreciated or amortized, it will only show the amount of expense it allocates to that time period not the amount of cash that went out the door for that asset. This can either overstate your profitability relative to cash flow (if you paid for the asset in that time period) or understate your cash flow relative to profitability if you did not buy that assets in the designated time period. A very important second area that creates a difference between profitability and cash flow is the recognition of revenue. Specifically, a customer may agree to purchase your product and it may be install and the customer formally accepts it. At that point the revenue can be recognized and accounted for in your Income Statement. The customer however may not have to pay, as we discussed above, for 30 days as per your agreement and, in fact, they may not pay for 60 days. The difference would be that your profitability would be higher than your cash flow, until the customer pays and the cash is received in your account.  Likewise, you may have to pay for something in your product (like COGS) and not recognized the expenses at the same time the cash has to go out of your company which can be another cause for discrepancy between profitability and cash flow. You must understand this limitations of the Income Statement but also understand that is still is one valuable indicator of the financial health or your business. All of these financial statements have strengths and weaknesses and they are used together as a suite to give a multidimensional view that is valuable.

Net Profit is the Gross Margin minus the M&S, R&D and G&A expenses which is very important to know as well but is much different than the Gross Profit which is another name for Gross Margin so be careful with your terms like Profit. Be specific and ask questions if you are confused.

Balance Sheet

An Income Statement is a view of the venture’s finances over a period of time while the Balance Sheet is a snapshot of the financial position at one given time. It tells you within the strict rules of accounting, what assets you have and what liabilities you owe to others. Inherent in this is to point out how much the company is worth, which is called “Shareholder Equity”. Shareholder Equity = Value of Assets – Value of Liabilities.

That may sound simple but it gets more complicated very quickly.

Assets can be broken down into short term assets, like cash and assets that can be quickly translated into cash, like Accounts Receivables as we talked about already. So it deals with that adjustment that should be made when trying to translating the bank statement into your real short term cash position. Short term is generally consider something that could be converted into cash within a year easily which may include inventory but that is also something that would be discounted a lot more than cash. Short term assets are also often called current assets.

In addition to short term assets, there are long term assets which are things like inventory (could be in either depending on nature and context), computers, other equipment, furniture, land, buildings, notes receivable that are not short term, and even intangible property such as patents and goodwill. As you can imagine, as you get into things like patents this gets less precise and when you move into the area of “goodwill,” even with strict account rules, it can get pretty abstract.  Long term assets are also called fixed assets.

Banks and most experience entrepreneurs significantly discount longer term assets, especially ones that are not hard assets that have a significant remaining useful life.

Liabilities are very similar to what we discuss in the section previously in this chapter title “Liabilities That Cause Your Bank Statement to Be Overstated.” At the risk of repeating, let say there are short term liabilities and longer term liabilities very similar to the Assets. These would be Accounts Payables but also potentially interest payments due on loans or mortgages. It could also be expenses you have accrued, meaning owe but not yet been invoiced for or accounted elsewhere, such as utilities, taxes, or wages owed to employees.  Similar to Assets, short term liabilities are often called current liabilities and long term are called non-current (as opposed to “fixed”). Long term liabilities is the principal on a loan that is outside of 12 months. The interest would be in short term liabilities. The dividing line for these groups of liabilities is likewise one year as you probably deduced from the preceding example.

Equity is a trickier concept because it shows some history in it that might surprise you. The will be an indication of the value of the company (not the “market value” but the “book value”). The book value is the equation above is a result of how much money was put into the company to begin with, how much has since been put into the business by investors who bought stock (or equity), how much money has it made and how much has been taken out of the business. These things will determine the book value. The market value is a completely different calculation for another time depending on factors such as growth rate, gross margins, capital efficiency, intellectual property, investor interest in the field, competitive strength and many other tangibles and intangibles. That is for later in the program when we discuss valuations for companies.

The first thing people look at in a balance sheet is the short term assets (essentially the cash and cash equivalents) and then subtract the short term liabilities. This gives the reader a sense of how much cash or “dry powder” does the company have.

The next question they are trying to figure out is the “burn rate” then. This is how much cash the company is losing each month (assuming it is losing cash). They then take the amount of money the company has and divide it by the burn rate to figure out how long the company has to go on the cash it has today without raising more money.

For example if from the balance sheet, it appears the company has $1 million dollars and it monthly burn rate is $100k per month, we know it has an estimate 10 months until it runs out of money without a further injection of cash. If the same company has a burn rate of $10K per month, it has a runway of 100 months, which all thing considered, is a lot better.

Statement of Cash Flows

The Cash Flow Statement sounds like exactly what we want but it can be complicated and is meant to integrate with the Income Statement and Balance Sheet so can, in my humble opinion, can more confusing than the simple explanations (I hope) I gave you above. There are also very strict rules about how to define parts of it.

Fundamentally, the Statement of Cash Flows tells you how much cash entered and left your business over a particular time period.

This statement has three parts:

  1. Cash Flows from Operations: This is what you make and spend in the normal course of doing business, which comes from your Income Statement.
  2. Cash Flow from Investing Activities: This is money you invest in capital assets as we discussed in the Income Statement section, by purchasing new equipment or investing in major projects that can be amortized for your business.
  3. Cash Flow from Financing Activities: As this title says, this is money that comes in or goes out of your company not related to the operations of the business but because of investors putting money in, getting money from loans, debtors getting money out or owners paying dividends. It also might be from one-time activities that don’t fit into the first two buckets but add or subtract money from the company.

Tip: Get your customers to pay you upfront for your product and it will give you a big advantage on cash flow. Instead of working capital being a drain on your cash, it will be a positive contributor to cash. This is another reason why a subscription business is attractive.

Summary

This is a very simple view of finances and there are thousands of books and courses on this topic and each sentence above, but now you should know enough to see the full landscape and not be daunted by this topic. At the end of the day, it is very simple math clothed in contextual complexities and definitions but it comes down to, do you have enough cash to run your business and grow it? How much and when?

Key points of chapter 2:

  • Cash is what matters and that is not clear from standard accounting statements and you should generally know the difference.  That difference is cash flow for assets that are depreciable and working capital – the difference of when you have to pay and when you receive payments not when the expenses and revenue is recorded from an accounting standpoint.
  • Revenue and expenses come in two varieties: one-time and recurring. All things being equal, recurring is much preferred for revenue whereas one time is preferred for expenses.
  • As a startup, always know your cash balance in the bank and your monthly burn rate so you know how many months of runway you have. Don’t let that runway get too short otherwise bad things can start to happen that will cause it to decrease even faster.

The author

Bill Aulet

A longtime successful entrepreneur, Bill is the Managing Director of the Martin Trust Center for MIT Entrepreneurship and Professor of the Practice at the MIT Sloan School of Management. He is changing the way entrepreneurship is understood, taught, and practiced around the world.

More about Bill

Latest tweets

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.
Follow @BillAulet
The books

This methodology with 24 steps and 15 tactics was created at MIT to help you translate your technology or idea into innovative new products. The books were designed for first-time and repeat entrepreneurs so that they can build great ventures.

Pre-order the books

Chapter 1: Why Financial Literacy and an Investor Readiness Program?

The Disciplined Entrepreneurship Toolbox

Stay ahead by using the 24 steps together with your team, mentors, and investors.

Start free trial
Sign up for our newsletter

Share this with your network

Articles / Blog / FeaturedPublished on January 2, 2022. 26 comments.

Bill Aulet

It’s the start of a new year, so what could be better than kicking it off with the first chapter of the upcoming book on financial literacy for founders? The only thing better than it would definitely be to get your thoughts on this new material, have you comment with thoughts and suggestions, and further share this material with others who might benefit from it, even in draft form.

Chapter One

Professor Josh Lerner of Harvard Business School is one of the most recognized and respected entrepreneurial finance professors of our generation. In 1994, I had the honor of taking his class and while I learned a lot in the course, the most important gem was in the first class in the first few minutes. “A financing strategy supports a business strategy; it is not the business strategy.”

Being an entrepreneur and working with thousands of entrepreneurs, I found myself continually coming back to this fundamental principle to ground discussions on strategy and execution. It seems obvious but in the heat of the battle, entrepreneurs (including myself) can get confused and think the goal is to raise money. It is not. It is simply an optional means to an end.

The goal is to build a new venture that serves a purpose (i.e., “raison d’etre”) and is economically sustainable. Success, if measured by how the business is able to have as much positive impact, aligned with the aforementioned purpose, as possible. The purpose is rarely singular and it is almost always multidimensional with multiple stakeholders.

While some people and media tend to get obsessed by it, the amount of money the company raised or the brand of the investors they raised it from is not the objective of a new venture nor a true measure of success. These factors are but supporting tactics that may, or may not, increase the odds of success of your business strategy and execution.

A company has never been successful because of a great fundraising strategy alone. On the other hand, I have seen many companies destroyed by poor fundraising strategy and execution.

When put in the proper context, a good fundraising strategy and execution could increase the odds of success and even, in rare instances when coupled with excellent business strategy and execution can become a significant competitive advantage.

So what is my point? Focus first on developing a great business and keep the fundraising in perspective. It is NOT the main thing. Ironically, the best way I have found to raise money is to focus on building a great business.

But wait, then why are we spending time on a “Financial Literacy and Investor Readiness Program”?

Let me explain. The number one job of a CEO in a startup company is to not run out of cash (attribution to my former teaching colleague, Howard Anderson). Think about that carefully, because it is why this book was written. A body that does not have oxygen will die. That is why on a plane they tell you first to put on your own oxygen mask before you start to help others. Likewise, for a business, cash is oxygen. Without it, the business dies and there is no purpose served, no strategy, no customers, no products, no employees, etc.

As such, the most fundamental scoreboard a business had to watch is the financial one. It might not be the most exciting but without it, you have nothing. In this program, we will not be turning you into a finance expert or teaching you tricks that will make your business successful. We will just teach you how not to lose in this area so that you can win with your core business strategy and execution. The parts where you can really distinguish yourself are innovation, creating a unique value proposition, culture, and team.

Because money is the oxygen for the company and financials are the oxygen monitor to keep it alive, everyone in the company should have basic financial literacy to understand key metrics. It should not just fall to the CEO and CFO. Everyone is invested in the venture surviving because if it does not, everyone is dramatically affected.

Key points of Chapter 1

  • The financing strategy and execution support the business strategy and execution, it is NOT the business strategy and execution.
  • The #1 job of the CEO in a new venture is to not run out of cash.
  • Financials are an essential scoreboard for your business that everyone should understand.

We will teach you in this book:

  1. Financial Literacy: What you need to know about finance to run your business
  2. Financial Modeling: How to develop a financial model to generate projections of your business that provides insights, meaningful projections, a potential path to greatness, and a planning tool
  3. Milestone Financing: The reason for milestone financing and what exactly it is.
  4. Sources of Financing: We will discuss what are the various sources of capital for a business and what are the pros and cons of each.
  5. Sourcing: How to generate leads, filter the leads to make a target list, and then how to sequence this list.
  6. Investor Presentations: How to develop and customize an investor presentation.
  7. Understanding Legal Dimension: We will provide a high-level overview of typical terms and conditions of financing and other legal considerations.
  8. Setting Up the Meeting: How to get the meetings you want
  9. Negotiation:  How to approach the funding process and negotiate with potential funders
  10. Current Considerations:  We will also talk about what are the current considerations in fundraising.
  11. Presenting: We will practice presenting to investors

The author

Bill Aulet

A longtime successful entrepreneur, Bill is the Managing Director of the Martin Trust Center for MIT Entrepreneurship and Professor of the Practice at the MIT Sloan School of Management. He is changing the way entrepreneurship is understood, taught, and practiced around the world.

More about Bill

Latest tweets

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.
Follow @BillAulet
The books

This methodology with 24 steps and 15 tactics was created at MIT to help you translate your technology or idea into innovative new products. The books were designed for first-time and repeat entrepreneurs so that they can build great ventures.

Pre-order the books

The Idea for Next Book: Financial Literacy

The Disciplined Entrepreneurship Toolbox

Stay ahead by using the 24 steps together with your team, mentors, and investors.

Start free trial
Sign up for our newsletter

Share this with your network

Articles / BlogPublished on December 5, 2021. 22 comments.

Bill Aulet

People often ask me when I am going to write another book. This is a funny question because I did not intend to write the first one. It is also incredibly hard to do it and get it right. Don’t get me wrong, I am very glad I did but I only did it because I knew there was a big need for it.

That being said, I am considering writing another one and I need your feedback. A topic that I think would be very helpful is “Financial Literacy for Entrepreneurs.” I will be releasing chapters and resources in the following weeks/months on this website, so make sure you subscribe to get notified:

Understanding the fundamentals of finance is not that difficult but too often I have seen entrepreneurs, especially engineers, who are just mystified by it and tend to ignore this critical part of any business for no good reason. This does not mean you have to be an accountant or a finance geek but every entrepreneur should know enough (that 20% that gives you 80% of the value and 95% of the confidence) to effectively run their own business and guide a finance group at a high level. It should not be a mysterious black box part of the business.

So my goal is to make the basics of finance accessible to all entrepreneurs who are willing to put in a little work. You don’t need to get an MBA to understand finance enough to run your business more effectively and to build models to improve decision-making on tradeoffs for an important decision. It is also imperative when the entrepreneur is thinking about and then executing a fundraising process – unless the entrepreneur just wants to delegate based on blind faith this dimension of the business. I strongly recommend against this. I am always saddened to see great entrepreneurial teams not realize their full potential because of a blind spot for understanding the critical scoreboard for their business, finance.

After all, if you don’t have money, you don’t have a business and if you don’t have enough money, your business will die and help no one.

My hypothesis, based on seeing thousands of entrepreneurs now, is the first gap that needs to be addressed is financial literacy and then this leads to fundraising. To do the latter before the former is to put the cart before the horse, i.e., the order is backward.

I should note that I am currently working on an edX course on this topic with MIT finance professors Antoinette Schoar and Matthew Rhodes-Kropf so your feedback will help focus this on the right topics as well.

Thanks for your feedback in advance. If the feedback is sufficient, I will post a new chapter here on a regular basis (depending on how long it takes to complete but it would be approximately every two weeks or so to start) and the project will move forward.

The author

Bill Aulet

A longtime successful entrepreneur, Bill is the Managing Director of the Martin Trust Center for MIT Entrepreneurship and Professor of the Practice at the MIT Sloan School of Management. He is changing the way entrepreneurship is understood, taught, and practiced around the world.

More about Bill

Latest tweets

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.
Follow @BillAulet
The books

This methodology with 24 steps and 15 tactics was created at MIT to help you translate your technology or idea into innovative new products. The books were designed for first-time and repeat entrepreneurs so that they can build great ventures.

Pre-order the books

Thoughts on the Current Status of Entrepreneurship

The Disciplined Entrepreneurship Toolbox

Stay ahead by using the 24 steps together with your team, mentors, and investors.

Start free trial
Sign up for our newsletter

Share this with your network

Articles / BlogPublished on October 3, 2021. 2 comments.

Bill Aulet

On September 14, 2021, I sat down with my old friend Dr. Peter Hirst for a LinkedIn Live fireside talk on the current state of entrepreneurship as we transition out of the worst of the COVID-19 pandemic and where I think it is going in the future.

While I am asked to give talks on this topic frequently, I particularly enjoyed this one because of the interactive format and Peter Hirst deft moderating. It is always fun to take questions from the audience which surpassed 2,000 live. So, while it is 57 minutes long, you can listen to it as a podcast while you are driving or working out at 1.5x speed and get the information.

COVID has made having an entrepreneurial mindset, skillset, and way of operating more important than ever but it is also changing it in fundamental ways. Without further ado, you can watch the whole event below. While I will take positions and have opinions on things, I don’t profess to be right all the time and would love to hear other perspectives in the comments section so we all can learn and get closer to the truth.

If you have thoughts on this, I’d love to hear them—use the comments section below!

The author

Bill Aulet

A longtime successful entrepreneur, Bill is the Managing Director of the Martin Trust Center for MIT Entrepreneurship and Professor of the Practice at the MIT Sloan School of Management. He is changing the way entrepreneurship is understood, taught, and practiced around the world.

More about Bill

Latest tweets

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.
Follow @BillAulet
The books

This methodology with 24 steps and 15 tactics was created at MIT to help you translate your technology or idea into innovative new products. The books were designed for first-time and repeat entrepreneurs so that they can build great ventures.

Pre-order the books

These Kids Will Put a Dent in the Universe: MIT 2021 delta v Teams & Demo Day Presentations

The Disciplined Entrepreneurship Toolbox

Stay ahead by using the 24 steps together with your team, mentors, and investors.

Start free trial
Sign up for our newsletter

Share this with your network

Articles / BlogPublished on September 20, 2021. No comments.

Bill Aulet

The MIT delta v Demo Day is always my favorite day of the year. It is a chance to see the best of the best at MIT in entrepreneurship crystalize their one-year journey in entrepreneurship and it also welcomes the next wave of students who will be on the stage the next year.

It is a chance to be inspired by the next generation and see what problems they are focused on. Let’s be clear, there are a lot of problems to be addressed: climate change, social injustice, economic injustice, medical costs & access, financial inclusion, food security, crumbling and outdated economic infrastructure, and much more. It is overwhelming and can be depressing. Where do we start?

We must not be overwhelmed and we must try to do something feasible to make a difference. That is the essence of entrepreneurship. Do something small to start to get things going but have a path to greatness to solve big problems. Beachhead market to follow on markets. Land and expand. Nail it then scale it. Call it whatever you want.

The essence of innovation-driven entrepreneurship is to do something and have it work and then grow it.  You must have your feet on the ground and be able to take one step forward but have a plan to get to the top of the mountain where you touch the sky. Do something that will put a dent in the universe and make a difference in the enormous problems facing us all today.

That is precisely what the MIT 2021 delta v teams have done. Huge ambition but concrete plans to get from where they are today to that place of high impact.

I am beyond proud to present this year’s cohort so incredibly ably run by Trust Center Entrepreneur In Residence (EIR) and Senior Lecturer Carly Chase in her first year after taking over the full reigns from Dr. Trish Cotter. Carly, along with the other Core EIRs Paul Cheek, Kit Hickey, and Kosta Ligris and swing EIRs Gabrielle Haddad, Sandy Kreis Lacey, Brint Markle, Dip Patel, and Kathleen Stetson did a fabulous job over the summer to prepare these teams for a Demo Day on September 10. At Demo Day, they presented to about one thousand people live (even in these COVID times) as well as many more than this online. The teams completely rose to this challenge too.

A huge thanks to the Trust Center Team led by Renee Benjamin, Brian Turnbull, Greg Wymer, and Magali Paoli. The teams were also supported by dozens of guest speakers and mentors as well as campus partners such as the Deshpande Center, MIT Sandbox Innovation Fund, MIT VMS, the Technology Licensing Office, and the Gordon Engineering Leadership Center. Finally, a special shout goes out to all of the 160 board members who volunteered their time for the month’s all-important mock board meetings. Thank you for lending your wisdom, expertise, and networks to help make the teams better. It certainly showed after each board meeting.

So without any further ado, let me introduce you to the MIT 2021 delta v cohort, the best of the best up and rising stars for entrepreneurship at MIT in the 2020-2021 Academic Year. The full list of teams, with details and links to connect to the ones you are interested in, can be found on the  MIT delta V accelerator page.

https://vimeo.com/603924504
https://vimeo.com/603938667
https://vimeo.com/603909757
https://vimeo.com/603905649
https://vimeo.com/603921793
https://vimeo.com/603898914
https://vimeo.com/603936021
https://vimeo.com/603933011
https://vimeo.com/603929818
https://vimeo.com/603919123
https://vimeo.com/603875987
https://vimeo.com/603927543


These are the new 2021 t=0 festival/Demo Day themed shirts, a concept originated by the Queensland University of Technology Entrepreneurship Group. Designed by Greg Wymer. Sponsored and made by Puma.

The author

Bill Aulet

A longtime successful entrepreneur, Bill is the Managing Director of the Martin Trust Center for MIT Entrepreneurship and Professor of the Practice at the MIT Sloan School of Management. He is changing the way entrepreneurship is understood, taught, and practiced around the world.

More about Bill

Latest tweets

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.
Follow @BillAulet
The books

This methodology with 24 steps and 15 tactics was created at MIT to help you translate your technology or idea into innovative new products. The books were designed for first-time and repeat entrepreneurs so that they can build great ventures.

Pre-order the books

Thoughts to Begin Summer 2021

The Disciplined Entrepreneurship Toolbox

Stay ahead by using the 24 steps together with your team, mentors, and investors.

Start free trial
Sign up for our newsletter

Share this with your network

Articles / BlogPublished on June 8, 2021. 1 comments.

Bill Aulet

The academic school year just wrapped up and summer has officially started. It is a time to look back and digest an amazing year and look forward to what needs to be done next.

  1. Observation – The Bar Keeps Going Up: After grading 41 business plans last weekend for the MIT Entrepreneurship 101 class (yes, despite the ranting about them, business plans are still an incredibly useful thing for entrepreneurs – just be careful how you define them and frame them in their value), I see the bar for quality in entrepreneurship continue to rise. This is so pleasing to see. Students are learning a broad portfolio of fundamentals and, very important as well, how to integrate them to increase their odds of success. That being said, there is still a lot of room for improvement (we were coming from a very low base) and I will get into some of this later in this article. I see this not just at MIT but also beyond. The headline observation is that highly skilled entrepreneurs are now much more common than they were just five years ago.
  2. Summer Goal #1 – What Effect Will Pandemic Have:  Something that I am watching very closely is what effect the pandemic will have on entrepreneurship when it is finally over. It has made the value, or may I say the necessity, of being an entrepreneur clearer than it has ever been before. However, from an operational standpoint, what will the landscape look like when we can take our masks off and go back to work physically?  At this point, all signs point to what I like to call “pandemonium after the pandemic” rather than a return to the previous status quo. An economic boom is underway where fears of inflation have replaced fears of recession.  This is not true for all markets but true for enough to give entrepreneurs a target-rich environment. That being the case, what will this look like otherwise? Will there be an even more intense war for talent because it will be no longer restrained by geography? Will a great data scientist in Indianapolis be able to work for a Silicon Valley startup with the associated compensation while enjoying the quality of life and costs of living in Indianapolis? (replace Indianapolis with your favorite living place). What will the hybrid workplace of the future look like? There are profound unanswered questions and while many have hypotheses, nobody knows for sure. It will surely affect the future of entrepreneurship, potentially in dramatic ways which just don’t know how yet. This topic is rapidly evolving over the next few months and definitely something I am going to digging into more.
  3. Summer Goal #2 – Entrepreneurial Sales: One of our most important courses, Entrepreneurial Sales, has just run into a crisis. After teaching the course so successfully for many years, the incredibly talented and successful trio teaching it, Kirk Arnold, Jim Schuchart, and Lou Shipley, have had to step back from leading this course for a variety of reasons. Living the Antifragile credo, we saw this crisis as an opportunity to rethink the course completely. In that process, we seem to have hit a vein of gold. Sales in an entrepreneurial environment have changed dramatically. The model we had built from the original frameworks that Howard Anderson put in place in 1998 when he started the course has lasted to this day. While there is much valuable material to be carried forward, we are thinking hard about whether a new framing of sales is in order to help us train the Chief Revenue Officers (interim or longer-term) of the next decade. We are also thinking about with that new framing, what additional materials and skill development we should add. The final question is how we should teach this. We have a task force looking at this and the more we dig into it, the more excited I get about the opportunity to produce very valuable new content for our students and the broader entrepreneurial community. We have to get this done over the summer because once September hits and the new school year starts, it is game time and the window of opportunity to have the time and space to do such significantly rethinking, redesigning, and developing is past – until next summer.
  4. Summer Goal #3 – delta v 2021: Similar to the Sales course, we have new leadership in our flagship delta v program at MIT. After Trish Cotter was able to get us to a whole new level, Carly Chase has taken the reins and will build off what Trish has done and add her impact to the program. In these times of transitions, there is even more opportunity to explore experimentally-driven change. I am looking forward to supporting Carly as she does this and seeing how we can take this cornerstone program to yet another level. I look forward to seeing how we can continue to improve the apprenticeship model of teaching entrepreneurship and press forward the frontiers of entrepreneurship education.
  5. Summer Goal #4 – Finance and Financing for Entrepreneurs: As previously mentioned, I think we now have the teaching of the mechanics of entrepreneurship to a more than acceptable level (but we will always seek to improve) but other areas need attention. In my personal entrepreneurial career, I realized how valuable it was to have an engineering, marketing, and finance skillset to build products and companies.  Having all three gave you a balanced perspective. I was surprised to find that that was unusual that was and have seen the consequences of unbalanced perspectives. Without at least a comfortable knowledge of finance, which is completely feasible and not that complicated, entrepreneurs tend to make decisions that significantly adversely affect their efforts. It starts with basic financial literacy. There is nothing to be scared of here and it can be explained relatively simply. Even if the entrepreneur wants to outsource these operations, it is still important to have an understanding of the fundamental concepts to manage them correctly and integrate them back in with the rest of the operations. After this, the process of fundraising can an unnecessary process of risk that can cripple or kill a company if not done correctly. We are creating an online class with world-renowned experts Professor Antoinette Schoar and Matthew Rhodes-Kropf (also an MIT professor but additionally a successful and currently active Venture Capitalist) to demystify Finance (starting with Financial Literacy) target at entrepreneurs. I must note how stimulating and fun it is to work with these experts who have dramatically different experiences and perspectives. Our goal is to no longer have great entrepreneurs who have found a great product-market fit with a differentiated product lose momentum because they don’t understand the financial aspects of the business. In my humble opinion, it is the easiest part of build a great new venture. Stay tuned and I have been working on this project for about a year and hope to wrap it up this summer. This will be a great complement to other materials like Brad Feld’s Venture Deals but bring a new unique piece of content to fill in the gaps.

I am sure there will be others things that pop up but there are my top four as we hit the first day of the summer. If I can get those done, it will be a very productive summer. If you have any thoughts on these topics, please share them with me. The collective wisdom of the group is always more than any individual or subgroup.

Best wishes to all of you for a restorative and enjoyable summer and I can’t wait for September when, hopefully, we can get back to a more normal life with the pandemic in the rearview mirror.

The author

Bill Aulet

A longtime successful entrepreneur, Bill is the Managing Director of the Martin Trust Center for MIT Entrepreneurship and Professor of the Practice at the MIT Sloan School of Management. He is changing the way entrepreneurship is understood, taught, and practiced around the world.

More about Bill

Latest tweets

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.
Follow @BillAulet
The books

This methodology with 24 steps and 15 tactics was created at MIT to help you translate your technology or idea into innovative new products. The books were designed for first-time and repeat entrepreneurs so that they can build great ventures.

Pre-order the books

Easter 2021 Basket of Updates: Trish Cotter Moves On, New delta v Leadership, New Online Finance Course in Development, Positives from Pandemic, Books I am Reading Now, and Pandemonium After Pandemic

The Disciplined Entrepreneurship Toolbox

Stay ahead by using the 24 steps together with your team, mentors, and investors.

Start free trial
Sign up for our newsletter

Share this with your network

Articles / BlogPublished on April 11, 2021. 5 comments.

Bill Aulet

An Easter 2021 basket full of random updates!

  • Trish Cotter Moves On: After over 5 years of complete dedication to the Martin Trust Center for MIT Entrepreneurship, Executive Director Trish Cotter has decided to transition out to find her next challenge. Trish’s spectacular contributions in running delta v, operations, teaching, mentoring, and overseeing the myriad of other programs like EDP has brought the center to a whole new level. She has been a gift to the students, the staff, MIT Sloan, MIT, and the entire entrepreneurial community, and while we hate to lose her, we understand and are so grateful for the time we have had. Trish loves challenges (and defeating them!) and is now ready for her next one, leaving the center for a great place. We will forever be indebted to her.
    In addition, Tommy Long, our long-time (5 plus years as well) head of operations at the center, is also ready for a new challenge. He has likewise taken the tail end of the pandemic to pursue a new challenge. He knows what his will be and it is at a private sector educational company (Emeritus) to apply his rich skillset in a dynamic new environment. Both are huge losses, but as an organization relentlessly committed to the development of our clients (students and others), we show the same commitment to the development of our staff, so this is the price we gladly pay, even if it is hard at times. We are also committed to being Antifragile so we have already put plans into place (with the help of Trish and Tommy) for Trust Center 3.0, a new set of actions to take us to yet another level building off the strong foundation built by Trish and Tommy.
  • New Leadership for delta v 2021: With Trish’s departure, the new leaders of MIT delta v will be familiar faces. Carly Chase takes the helm for this flagship program having been at our center since 2017 when she founded the Trust Center NYC Startup Studio. Carly has since taken on increasing responsibilities each year including StartMIT, teaching our Advance Entrepreneurship Course, taking over and revitalizing our Membership Program, and, most recently, teaching Corporate Entrepreneurship. She will be running delta v with experienced partners Paul Cheek, Kit Hickey, and Kosta Ligris – all Entrepreneurs In Residence (EIRs) at our center as well as Lecturers teaching entrepreneurship. The program is in great hands and will be going full throttle this summer. We look forward to the innovations the team will be implementing and experimenting with the new cohort. Applications are already in and it is looking like a very strong, dynamic, and diverse set of student ventures. Can’t wait.
  • New Online Course on “Finance and Financing” for Entrepreneurs Under Development Now: My big side project now is working on something that people have been requesting for years, but the pandemic finally gave me some time to work on. Following the success of our edX online courses, the most frequent question I get is “When will there be additional courses on how to raise money and how to build a great team?”
    While I think the latter is more important than the former, creating a fundraising course is easier and we are working on that with urgency now. Partnering with renowned MIT Sloan professors and experts Antoinette Schoar and Matthew Rhodes-Kropf as well as Teaching Assistants Merritt Jenkins and Riana Shah, we are in the midst of creating what we believe will be a unique course. It is targeted at entrepreneurs who don’t know anything about finance to start and explain why they should learn—and what specifically they should learn—without turning them into MBAs, investment bankers, accountants, or anything of the sort. We plan to explain all that you need to know, but with the rigor and relevance, that MIT is well known for. The course will make all of this accessible in a way that has never been possible. In addition to the entrepreneur’s perspective, we will also offer the investor’s perspective (Matthew) and the researcher’s perspective (Antoinette). It has been a lot of work so far but also great fun, and I can’t wait for the result. Hope to have it out in the second half of 2021.
  • Positive Side of the Pandemic: While we would never have wished for a pandemic, we have to acknowledge there have been some positive things that have come out of this. The ability to do outreach and connect with external (to MIT) entrepreneurial stakeholders has been severely limited in the past. As I look back over just the past 30 days, we have been able to do very meaningful engagement with workshops for Volta/Dalhousie University/CDL in Halifax, Catalyst in Belfast, Oxford University (upcoming), and The Cube in Spain. We were able to do all of this without having to waste time on planes and recovering from time zone adjustments. We could do this without missing a beat on all of our activities at MIT as well. It has been awesome and I hope it continues after the pandemic. Don’t get me wrong, I miss seeing people in person and that is even better, but this is not bad and the ROI might be even higher. There will be a mix of virtual and in-person in the future, but we will never go back to the old way. There is another better alternative now.
  • Post-Pandemic Pandemonium: The Pandemic of 1918 was followed by the Roaring ’20s. I don’t think that was an accident. You can feel the energy waiting to be unleashed when this pandemic is over and it is going to be very exciting. Make sure your seat belts are fastened and your trays are in a locked and upright position because it is going to be a bit crazy, but a great time to be alive.
  • Books I am Reading* Now: I include an asterisk because any of you who know me know I listen to the books while working out, walking, driving, or something else rather than technically reading them. Admit it, you do too for the most part. In any case, I was a bit surprised how a previous post of best books was so well received so let me tell you what I am reading now and my preliminary thoughts. Would also love suggestions.
    The first book is called “Grasp” by Sanjay Sarma and you will hear a lot more about this in a future post. I have finished it and am still processing all the lessons I am taking away from it. “Grasp” is a history and study of how we teach and learn using brain and cognitive science in a way I had never seen before. As a disclaimer, I work a lot with Sanjay and like him a lot so I cannot be considered unbiased, but I feel I can still be pretty objective. The book has already changed how I think about teaching in subtle and profound ways. His biological explanations of how humans learn and retain information is something that we may have understood a bit instinctually, but he drives these points home so they become more central to how we should teach. Stimulating curiosity, repeating things over time, and peer-to-peer learning are just a few of the things I am taking away. I keep going back to the book to review parts to see how I can make our courses and programs more inclusive and impactful. Great, great stuff here.
    The book I am reading now is called “Why Startups Fail” and has just come out. It’s by the extremely well regarded Tom Eisenmann from Harvard Business School who oversees their entrepreneurial efforts including the iLab. I am only up to Chapter 3 so far, but it is exceptionally well written (I wish I could write that well) and makes a lot of good points. Personally, I must say that I have yet to hit the point where I have gotten great new insights and, for those of you who know me, I am no fan of the constant references to “Lean Startup methodology.” While Lean Startup was helpful to popularize these concepts at an important time, I think Stefan Thomke’s research and other work on experimentation was more precise and helpful to me. The Lean Startup “movement” (never liked that word for an educational concept) went overboard and actually got too much attention relative to all the other things that need to be done to make a successful new innovation-driven venture. That being said and off my chest now, this is a personal peeve and I am sure I will get over it by the end of the book because Tom does such great work and is just a font of knowledge on the topic of entrepreneurship. I am less than 30% done with the book so far so much remains to be sorted out and these are just my first impressions. I fully intend to finish the book, which is not true for about 70% of the books I start. You are getting feedback in the middle of the process, which is always dangerous, but there you go. Never short on opinions but ready to, as Adam Grant said, “think again” and change them.

Happy Easter to all and hope you and your loved ones are healthy, safe, and mentally sound. We are almost to the other side. Stay strong and we will be reborn better and into an exciting time in the history of humankind.

The author

Bill Aulet

A longtime successful entrepreneur, Bill is the Managing Director of the Martin Trust Center for MIT Entrepreneurship and Professor of the Practice at the MIT Sloan School of Management. He is changing the way entrepreneurship is understood, taught, and practiced around the world.

More about Bill

Latest tweets

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.
Follow @BillAulet
The books

This methodology with 24 steps and 15 tactics was created at MIT to help you translate your technology or idea into innovative new products. The books were designed for first-time and repeat entrepreneurs so that they can build great ventures.

Pre-order the books

Latest Thinking on Corporate Entrepreneurship

The Disciplined Entrepreneurship Toolbox

Stay ahead by using the 24 steps together with your team, mentors, and investors.

Start free trial
Sign up for our newsletter

Share this with your network

Articles / BlogPublished on March 28, 2021. 2 comments.

Bill Aulet

As is mentioned in the Adam Grant book “Think Again,” if we don’t look back at ourselves a year ago and say, “Wow, I understand that topic so much better today than I did a year ago,” then we are not learning fast enough.

One of those topics we are learning more about each day in is Corporate Entrepreneurship. It is very complicated and gigantically important. There is also a great deal of performative art on the subject and not nearly enough discipline and systematic knowledge at the current time.

In 2019 and 2020, I had the good fortune to teach a class with Elaine Chen (formerly EIR at the Trust Center and now Professor and head of entrepreneurship education at Tufts University) and longtime friend Sue Siegel (most recently the Chief Innovation Officer of GE as well as CEO of GE Ventures).

This set the foundation of knowledge that we built off for the Corporate Innovation course for this spring (2021). Trust Center EIR and MIT Sloan Lecturer Carly Chase took the lead on this year’s course and helped raise it to a whole new level.

Each week we talk about our experiences, hypotheses, and frameworks to improve corporate innovation and entrepreneurship with a very senior group of students at MIT Sloan – many of whom are Executive MBAs with critical executive operating roles in the area of innovation in their respective organizations. They keep the conversation real and current.

We all, faculty and students, look forward to the class because it is so conversational and everyone has deep experience and thoughtful opinions on how this very important challenge. With each class, everyone leaves better informed and inspired that it is possible and how it should best be implemented. It is a classic case where the collective wisdom of the group is greater than anyone individual and by sharing, we all gain.

I am happy to share with the broader community who can’t come to the class each week some of the material coming out of this course (it will always be improving and evolving so it is not a finished product) right now. I discuss one of the classes in a series our Martin Trust Center for MIT Entrepreneurship is doing with old friend and great Spanish entrepreneur Alberto Rodriguez de Lama called “The Radical Sessions” put on by The Cube. I also must note the great help that Andrés Haddad Di Marco and his team have provided to make this possible.

I will warn you upfront that this is a bit long (the total video is 53 minutes with the Q&A) but that is what is needed to seriously deal with this complicated topic – and this is only one part of it. In this talk, we step back and apply lessons learned from Startup-oriented Disciplined Entrepreneurship to a Corporate Environment (which could be any large organization – public, private, academic, government, etc.) to increase your odds of success.

There is so much more that still needs to be done and hopefully, we will look back next year and see how much further we have come to understand and make concrete frameworks to help large organizations become more entrepreneurial and innovative.

The author

Bill Aulet

A longtime successful entrepreneur, Bill is the Managing Director of the Martin Trust Center for MIT Entrepreneurship and Professor of the Practice at the MIT Sloan School of Management. He is changing the way entrepreneurship is understood, taught, and practiced around the world.

More about Bill

Latest tweets

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.
Follow @BillAulet
The books

This methodology with 24 steps and 15 tactics was created at MIT to help you translate your technology or idea into innovative new products. The books were designed for first-time and repeat entrepreneurs so that they can build great ventures.

Pre-order the books